In-Space Transportation Propulsion Architecture Assessment
Description:... Almost all space propulsion development and application has been chemical. Aerobraking has been used at Venus and Mars, and for entry at Jupiter. One electric propulsion mission has been flown (DS-1) and electric propulsion is in general use by commercial communications satellites for stationkeeping. Gravity assist has been widely used for high-energy missions (Voyager, Galileo, Cassini, etc.). It has served as a substitute for high-energy propulsion but is limited in energy gain, and adds mission complexity as well as launch opportunity restrictions. It has very limited value for round trip missions such as humans to Mars and return. High-energy space propulsion has been researched for many years, and some major developments, such as nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP), undertaken. With the exception of solar electric propulsion at a scale of a few kilowatts, high-energy space propulsion has never been used on a mission. Most mission studies have adopted TRL 6 technology because most have looked for a near-term start. The current activity is technology planning aimed at broadening the options available to mission planners. Many of the illustrations used in this report came from various NASA sources; their use is gratefully acknowledged.Woodcock, GordonMarshall Space Flight CenterTRANSPORTATION; COMMERCIAL SPACECRAFT; NUCLEAR PROPULSION; SOLAR ELECTRIC PROPULSION; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; STATIONKEEPING; AEROBRAKING; GALILEO SPACECRAFT; GRAVITATION; LAUNCHING
Show description